.png)
Web3 Social Apps Are Actually Useful Now
- Jun 2
- 8 min read
Updated: Oct 20
Farcaster, Lens, and the unexpected rise of usable blockchain-based social media
Web3 social platforms have been around for years, but few have managed to prove they can support steady, public use without depending on financial incentives or hype cycles.
Apps like Farcaster and Lens Protocol are now functioning beyond early adopters. They’ve moved past token trials and into daily interaction. Users are posting, replying, collecting content, and earning — without depending on centralized feeds or advertising systems. The architecture is open, the usage is measurable, and the data is fully accessible.
Farcaster has surpassed 2.8 million posts. Lens Protocol has distributed more than $3.2 million to creators through on-chain collections. Dozens of independent applications are drawing from their social graphs to build feeds, channels, and tools.
These platforms are not pitching potential. They’re demonstrating real behavior: creators are earning directly, conversations are taking place across networks, and user identities are no longer bound to a single interface.
The scale may be modest, but the function is concrete. Activity is recorded. Applications are interoperable. Participation doesn’t require permission from a platform.
Farcaster: A Publishing System That Doesn’t Need a Platform
Farcaster operates on one clear principle: your content belongs to you, not the app. It’s not trying to build a walled garden. Instead, it provides a base layer that anyone can write to, read from, and build on top of. What you create, you control.
Each post on Farcaster—called a “cast”—is linked to a unique on-chain identity. That identity is stored on Optimism, and once registered, it’s portable across every client built on the protocol. You don’t need to recreate your profile or start from scratch each time you try a new interface. One ID, many options.
The most widely used client today is Warpcast, which offers a familiar look and feel, similar to mainstream apps. But that’s only one of more than 30 tools tapping into the Farcaster graph. These include Alphacaster, Neynar, Flink, and several others experimenting with feeds, formats, and permissions.
This isn’t theoretical. As of May 2025:
More than 2.8 million posts have been recorded
Over 80,000 individual IDs are active
Developers are using open APIs like Neynar’s to build bots, analytics dashboards, and social discovery tools
Unlike platforms driven by ads or virality, Farcaster doesn’t reward clicks. It supports structure. You can follow conversations across channels. You can publish without gatekeeping. You can leave without losing your content.
Every post is stored permanently. Every interaction is visible. Nothing gets buried under a black-box algorithm.
Farcaster’s model also encourages experimentation. One post can travel across apps. Developers can remix the interface without waiting for approval. The backend remains consistent. The front-end remains flexible.
And that flexibility is starting to attract builders who want more than one channel to publish in. They’re choosing to plug into Farcaster not because it’s loud or hyped, but because it’s usable, consistent, and built to last.
Lens Protocol: Monetization Built Into the Feed
Lens Protocol is built around a simple idea: social content should be part of the value exchange, not just a vessel for attention.
It doesn't rely on ads. There's no algorithmic feed nudging what you see. Instead, every piece of content lives on-chain, tied to a profile that can issue posts, accept reactions, and offer direct collection. Users can collect a post into their wallet. That collection can involve a transaction. When they mirror a post, others can collect through them — with a portion of the value routed to the original creator or even to the person who shared it.
This structure rewires how publishing and compensation work. It's not a patch. It's part of the base protocol.
As of May 2025:
Creators have earned over $3.2 million directly through on-chain collections
There are more than 150,000 active profiles
Platforms like Orb, Lenster, Hey, and Phaver have become active interfaces built around the Lens graph
Analytics dashboards show repeat behavior — users who return to post, collect, and build audiences over time
What's different here is how earning happens. There's no tipping jar bolted onto a social feed. There's no affiliate engine tucked away in the bio. The feed itself supports compensation.
Content is not diluted by reach mechanics. There's no need to trigger engagement to gain placement. The value lies in the connection between author and collector — no middleman, no auction-based placement, no opaque ranking.
Every post can be seen, shared, or monetized based on the reader's intent. Every profile can define its own terms. Some charge a fixed amount per collection. Some let anyone collect for free. Others split proceeds between multiple parties.
That flexibility has made Lens an appealing choice for creators who want control. Not just over how they publish, but over how their work moves and how it earns.
The result transcends viral loops. It's continuity.
And that's part of what makes it durable. Monetization is not a layer stacked on later. It's in the base logic — stable, visible, and permanent.
The Broader Context
Web3 social apps aren’t developing in isolation. They’re part of a much larger pattern — where blockchain-backed infrastructure is being applied to areas far beyond tokens and collectibles.
One of the clearest examples is the tokenization of real-world assets. Institutional players have started to publish numbers that were unthinkable just two years ago. Asset managers are tokenizing government debt instruments. Startups are building products that combine token issuance with custody and compliance rails. These moves aren’t theoretical or experimental — they’re tracked in live production environments, visible on-chain.
Here are a few current figures that help frame this shift:
BlackRock’s tokenized U.S. Treasury fund (BUIDL) crossed $2.9 billion in AUM in under four months
Franklin Templeton’s OnChain U.S. Government Money Fund now manages over $680 million on public chains
The total value of tokenized U.S. Treasuries surpassed $5 billion in Q1 2025, according to RWA.xyz
Blockchain-native protocols like Ondo Finance and Backed are facilitating real-time issuance, with programmable compliance logic and transparent asset tracking baked in
These aren’t products aimed at speculators. They’re designed for institutions, family offices, and asset managers looking for liquidity, transparency, and auditable flows. That matters because it validates not just the technology, but the operating structure behind it.
And this same structure — public infrastructure, shared indexing layers, wallet-based access, permissionless read/write capabilities — is what powers platforms like Farcaster and Lens.
They’re built on compatible foundations. That’s what allows developers to build social front ends one week and tokenized asset dashboards the next. The stack remains the same. Only the context changes.
This cross-functionality is not accidental. It’s the result of decisions made early in the design of protocols like Optimism, Polygon, and Base — where composability and modular tooling enable progress without requiring coordination through a single gate.
Social is now benefiting from the same principles. Farcaster’s ID layer lives on Optimism. Lens writes to Polygon. Both are building within the same ecosystem that’s quietly becoming the infrastructure backbone for tokenized capital markets.
Which raises a simple, overlooked point: these social apps are more than chat rooms or content streams. They’re functional proofs of what user-owned interfaces can look like — across networks that were initially architected for money, but now support media, reputation, and identity just as effectively.
What’s Working
Web3 social apps have moved well past concept stage. They’re running, serving users, and supporting developers. The metrics are public. The behavior is measurable. Still, no system is without friction.
Here’s a breakdown of what’s functioning reliably — and what hasn’t yet reached full readiness.
Where It’s Holding Up
1. Core interactions are stable.
Posting, collecting, mirroring, replying — all the day-to-day actions users expect from a social app are live. The base mechanics are working consistently across interfaces. Threads are persistent. Replies load predictably. Identity resolution doesn’t break across clients. These are details most people won’t notice, which is exactly the point. The architecture behaves like infrastructure.
2. Monetization is embedded, not appended.
On Lens, creators don’t need workarounds to earn. There are no backdoors or sponsor links buried under posts. If someone likes your content, they can collect it directly. If they want to support distribution, they can mirror it with a revenue-sharing clause. It’s an on-chain contract, not a platform decision. That clarity has drawn creators who are focused on independence, not reach.
3. Developer tooling is improving fast.
Frameworks like Neynar for Farcaster and Lens.js for Lens Protocol have lowered the barrier to build. You don’t need to write from scratch to stand up a usable front end. That’s leading to a wave of micro-experiments: niche clients, custom feeds, and apps designed for specific subcultures or workflows. These tools may not scale overnight, but they are expanding what’s possible within the same protocol.
4. Data is public and queryable.
Anyone can audit usage. Anyone can build analytics. Farcaster metrics are indexed on Dune. Lens data is available through GraphQL. No one needs to guess what’s happening behind the scenes. This transparency allows the market to self-correct and helps new builders avoid dead ends.
Where Friction Remains
1. Mobile UX varies widely.
Some clients like Warpcast and Orb are clean and consistent. Others feel brittle, especially on lower-end devices or with slower connections. Gesture behavior and layout responsiveness still fall short of consumer-grade expectations in some places. For the next wave of adoption to take hold, smoother mobile experiences will matter more than protocol design.
2. Wallet onboarding remains confusing for first-timers.
Even with tools like Privy and Web3Auth, new users often stall during account setup. Switching networks, approving transactions, setting permissions — these steps aren’t always intuitive. For seasoned users, they’re manageable. For others, they’re reasons to bounce. Bridging that gap is less a technical challenge and more a matter of flow design.
3. Cross-app consistency is uneven.
While the protocol ensures your content and identity travel with you, different clients interpret features differently. Some support certain post types. Others omit them. Formatting may break between interfaces. What looks polished in one app might feel clunky in another. This weakens the sense of cohesion across the network.
4. User education lags behind technical progress.
There’s a knowledge gap between how these systems work and how they’re perceived. Many potential users still assume Web3 social apps are slow, speculative, or hard to use — based on outdated experiences. Until that perception is addressed with better documentation, live demos, and consistent messaging, adoption will remain gradual.
This is not a verdict. It’s a snapshot. These tools are progressing without ceremony, building towards usability one layer at a time. And for those already participating, that’s enough. They’re not waiting for the market to catch up. They’re using the apps today — for conversation, publishing, and value exchange — with results that can be verified on-chain, not assumed.
Closing Thoughts
Web3 social platforms are no longer a concept in waiting. They’re functioning ecosystems where content is owned, identities are portable, and incentives are transparent.
They don’t need mass adoption to be valid. They don’t need headlines to justify their architecture. What they’ve gained instead is time-tested credibility — not through branding, but through measurable use.
These platforms don’t compete with legacy networks on volume. They offer a different premise. They invite participants to engage without handing over their identity. They support builders who prefer interoperability over exclusivity. They serve users who value visibility in function over visibility in feed placement.
🎥 Watch the Video
For a quick video version of this post, watch my YouTube video: Web3 Social Apps Are Actually Useful Now — Proof You Can See
🗣️ Join the Conversation
Blockchain and Web3 Insights LLC is committed to delivering fact-based, practical education on Bitcoin, blockchain, and decentralized technologies. If this article was useful, please share it with your network and connect with us through the channels below to continue the conversation.
🔗 Stay Connected:
Follow Blockchain & Web3 Insights across platforms for weekly updates, insights, and resources:
YouTube: Blockchain and Web3 Insights
Bluesky Social: @blockchainweb3
Instagram: blockchainandweb3
Twitter/X: @Ajay8307
Threads: @atom8307
Medium: Blockchain and Web3 Insights
LinkedIn: BlockchainandWeb3Insights
📩 Subscribe to My Newsletter:
Stay current with Blockchain & Web3 Weekly Bytes, published every Saturday. Each edition includes:
Clear insights on Bitcoin, blockchain, and digital assets
A weekly trivia feature
Practical updates designed for learners, teams, and professionals
📚 Educational Resources:
Blockchain and Web3 Insights curates and creates resources to support learning and practical application. Explore:
⛔️ Disclaimer ⛔️
This article is for educational purposes only and is not financial advice. Do your own research and consult a professional before making any investment decisions. Some links may be affiliate links that support Blockchain and Web3 Insights LLC at no extra cost to you.
Comments